264 lines
9.7 KiB
Markdown
264 lines
9.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: delegate-to-agent
|
|
description: >-
|
|
How to delegate all AI work to the agent chat. Use when delegating AI work
|
|
from UI or scripts to the agent, when a user asks for agent behavior or
|
|
LLM-powered features, when tempted to add inline LLM calls, or when sending
|
|
messages to the agent from application code.
|
|
scope: dev
|
|
metadata:
|
|
internal: true
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Delegate All AI to the Agent
|
|
|
|
## Rule
|
|
|
|
The UI never calls an LLM directly. Product workflows are delegated to the
|
|
agent through the chat bridge so users can see, steer, and audit the work.
|
|
Server-side one-shot model calls are an explicit escape hatch for narrow text
|
|
transforms only; use `completeText()` from `@agent-native/core/server` when the
|
|
work intentionally does not need tools, chat history, or run state.
|
|
|
|
## Why
|
|
|
|
The agent is the single AI interface. It has context about the full project, can read/write any file, and can run scripts. Inline LLM calls bypass this — they create a shadow AI that doesn't know what the agent knows and can't coordinate with it.
|
|
|
|
## How
|
|
|
|
**From the UI (client):**
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
import { sendToAgentChat } from "@agent-native/core/client/agent-chat";
|
|
|
|
sendToAgentChat({
|
|
message: "Generate a summary of this document",
|
|
context: documentContent, // optional hidden context (not shown in chat UI)
|
|
submit: true, // auto-submit to the agent
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**From the UI, in the background:**
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
import { sendToAgentChat } from "@agent-native/core/client/agent-chat";
|
|
|
|
sendToAgentChat({
|
|
message: "Analyze this import and create any missing records",
|
|
context: `Import batch id: ${batchId}`,
|
|
submit: true,
|
|
newTab: true,
|
|
background: true,
|
|
openSidebar: false,
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This is still a full agent run: tools, actions, thread state, and run tracking
|
|
all remain active. It simply does not focus or open the sidebar.
|
|
|
|
**From scripts (Node):**
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
import { agentChat } from "@agent-native/core";
|
|
|
|
agentChat.submit("Process the uploaded images and create thumbnails");
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**For narrow server-side text transforms:**
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
import { completeText } from "@agent-native/core/server";
|
|
|
|
const result = await completeText({
|
|
systemPrompt: "Return exactly one sentiment label.",
|
|
input: messageBody,
|
|
maxOutputTokens: 12,
|
|
temperature: 0,
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Wrap user-facing uses in actions so the UI and agent share the same operation.
|
|
Do not call provider SDKs directly.
|
|
|
|
**From the UI, detecting when agent is done:**
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
import { useAgentChatGenerating } from "@agent-native/core/client/agent-chat";
|
|
|
|
function MyComponent() {
|
|
const isGenerating = useAgentChatGenerating();
|
|
// Show loading state while agent is working
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## `submit` vs Prefill
|
|
|
|
The `submit` option controls whether the message is sent automatically or placed in the chat input for user review:
|
|
|
|
| `submit` value | Behavior | Use when |
|
|
| -------------- | --------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| `true` | Auto-submits to the agent immediately | Routine operations the user has already approved |
|
|
| `false` | Prefills the chat input for user review | High-stakes operations (deleting data, modifying code, API calls with side effects) |
|
|
| omitted | Uses the project's default setting | General-purpose delegation |
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
// Auto-submit: routine operation
|
|
sendToAgentChat({ message: "Update the project summary", submit: true });
|
|
|
|
// Prefill: let user review before sending
|
|
sendToAgentChat({
|
|
message: "Delete all projects older than 30 days",
|
|
submit: false,
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Capture user input first when generating from a prompt
|
|
|
|
Buttons that produce new content ("New Design", "Create Dashboard", "Make Deck", "Generate Form") need the user's prompt as input. **Never hardcode a generic message** — the result will be a generic generation the user didn't actually ask for.
|
|
|
|
**Bad** — auto-submits a placeholder message; the user never said what they wanted:
|
|
|
|
```tsx
|
|
<Button
|
|
onClick={() =>
|
|
sendToAgentChat({ message: "make a design", submit: true })
|
|
}
|
|
>
|
|
New Design
|
|
</Button>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Good** — Popover anchored to the button captures the prompt, then submits it:
|
|
|
|
```tsx
|
|
<Popover open={open} onOpenChange={setOpen}>
|
|
<PopoverTrigger asChild>
|
|
<Button>New Design</Button>
|
|
</PopoverTrigger>
|
|
<PopoverContent className="w-96">
|
|
<Textarea
|
|
autoFocus
|
|
value={prompt}
|
|
onChange={(e) => setPrompt(e.target.value)}
|
|
placeholder="What do you want to design?"
|
|
/>
|
|
<Button
|
|
onClick={() => {
|
|
sendToAgentChat({ message: prompt, submit: true });
|
|
setOpen(false);
|
|
setPrompt("");
|
|
}}
|
|
>
|
|
Create
|
|
</Button>
|
|
</PopoverContent>
|
|
</Popover>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Always ask for input first when** the output depends on a prompt the user must provide — "design what?", "deck about what?", "dashboard for which metric?", "form for which use case?".
|
|
|
|
**Auto-submit without input is fine when intent is unambiguous:**
|
|
|
|
- "Try to fix" on a tool error — submits the error details with a clear fix instruction
|
|
- "Retry the last operation" after a transient failure
|
|
- Single-purpose buttons where there is nothing meaningful for the user to add
|
|
|
|
If you find yourself writing `submit: true` with a hardcoded creative verb (`"design a..."`, `"write a..."`, `"build a..."`), stop and add a Popover.
|
|
|
|
## Delegating to a Sub-Agent (Agent Teams)
|
|
|
|
`sendToAgentChat()` delegates from app code _to_ the agent. The other axis of
|
|
delegation is the agent handing work _to a sub-agent_ through the Agent Teams
|
|
run-manager. The main chat stays the orchestrator: it spawns sub-agents, then
|
|
reads and integrates their results.
|
|
|
|
### When to spawn a sub-agent vs do it yourself
|
|
|
|
- **Do it yourself** when the work is small, on the critical path, or tightly
|
|
coupled to what you're already doing. Sub-agent overhead and coordination risk
|
|
outweigh the benefit.
|
|
- **Spawn a sub-agent** for a self-contained unit of work that can run
|
|
independently — a disjoint investigation, an isolated implementation slice, a
|
|
long-running search — especially when it frees the main thread to keep
|
|
orchestrating.
|
|
|
|
### Briefing contract
|
|
|
|
Every sub-agent brief must specify four things, or the sub-agent will guess:
|
|
|
|
- **Objective** — the one concrete outcome it owns, in a sentence.
|
|
- **Context** — the facts it needs (paths, prior findings, constraints) so it
|
|
doesn't re-derive them.
|
|
- **Output** — the exact shape you want back (a summary, a file edited, a list
|
|
of paths, a yes/no with rationale).
|
|
- **Boundaries** — what it must NOT touch (files, branches, side effects) and
|
|
when to stop and report rather than push forward.
|
|
|
|
### Fan-out discipline
|
|
|
|
- **Default to a single sub-agent.** Most delegation is one focused task.
|
|
- **Spawn multiple only for genuinely independent units** that don't share state
|
|
or files. Never parallelize coupled work — if B needs A's output, run them in
|
|
sequence.
|
|
- **Cap parallel fan-out at ~3.** More sub-agents means more synthesis cost and
|
|
more chance of conflicting edits to the same area.
|
|
|
|
### Synthesis discipline
|
|
|
|
- **Read every result** before concluding — don't act on the first one back.
|
|
- **Reconcile conflicts** between sub-agent findings explicitly; decide which is
|
|
right rather than averaging or ignoring.
|
|
- **Integrate into one answer.** The main thread produces the single coherent
|
|
result; it never just forwards raw sub-agent transcripts to the user.
|
|
|
|
Background sub-agents must use the core run-manager / Agent Teams infrastructure
|
|
rather than ad-hoc LLM calls.
|
|
|
|
## Don't
|
|
|
|
- Don't `import Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"` in client or server code
|
|
- Don't `import OpenAI from "openai"` in client or server code
|
|
- Don't make direct API calls to any LLM provider
|
|
- Don't use AI SDK functions like `generateText()`, `streamText()`, etc.
|
|
- Don't build "AI features" that bypass the agent chat
|
|
- Don't auto-submit a hardcoded prompt for generative actions — capture user input first (see above)
|
|
- Don't use `completeText()` for workflows that need tools, database writes,
|
|
auditability, user steering, or multi-step reasoning. Use the agent chat
|
|
instead, optionally with `background: true`.
|
|
|
|
## Exception
|
|
|
|
Scripts may call external APIs (image generation, search, etc.) — but the AI
|
|
reasoning and orchestration still goes through the agent. A script is a tool
|
|
the agent uses, not a replacement for the agent.
|
|
|
|
`completeText()` is allowed for small server-side transforms such as
|
|
classification, extraction, rewriting a short string, or normalizing messy
|
|
provider text. It deliberately runs with `tools: []` and does not create chat
|
|
thread state.
|
|
|
|
## When to Use A2A Instead
|
|
|
|
`sendToAgentChat()` delegates work to the **local** agent — the one running alongside your app. When the work should go to a **different** agent entirely (e.g., asking an analytics agent for data, or a calendar agent for availability), use the A2A (agent-to-agent) protocol instead.
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
import { callAgent } from "@agent-native/core/a2a";
|
|
|
|
// Call a different agent — not the local agent chat
|
|
const stats = await callAgent(
|
|
"https://analytics.example.com",
|
|
"What were last week's signups?",
|
|
{ apiKey: process.env.ANALYTICS_A2A_KEY },
|
|
);
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
See the **a2a-protocol** skill for the full pattern.
|
|
|
|
## Related Skills
|
|
|
|
- **a2a-protocol** — When the work goes to a different agent, not the local one
|
|
- **actions** — The agent invokes actions via `pnpm action <name>` to perform complex operations
|
|
- **self-modifying-code** — The agent operates through the chat bridge to make code changes
|
|
- **storing-data** — The agent writes results to the database after processing requests
|
|
- **real-time-sync** — The UI updates automatically when the agent writes data
|